There are two points that has heavy influence from Lamarck's ideas which are "Who gets better access to these limited resources?" and that "If the environment changes, the traits that are helpful or adaptive to that environment will be different." The first one explains that the organism that is better fit for the environment has a better chance to adapt to their environment with greater reproductive success. Lamarck contributed the idea that animals or organisms with certain traits can strive in a sense. His basic idea that these acquired characteristics were driven by the inner need, so what Lamarck tried to explain with the giraffes was that the one with the longer neck would be more successfully and this was due to the inner need. Thus, the ones with the longer necks have the acquired traits that Lamarck said with a changing environment would use and not use body parts, causing those traits to be inherited in offspring. However, the most influence of Lamarck's is on the other point because the other point explained that those with new adaptive traits will have greater reproductive success and those traits will spread, causing change in the population and environment. Lamarck's idea was that if the environment were to change then the animal's activity would change to adapt to that environment, in which those traits were inherited, influencing Darwin to manifest the idea that organisms suitable for an environment survive to reproduce and pass on their acquired traits and thus will spread on the change until the environment changes and another trait is favored. Therefore, Lamarck influence the idea that the traits driven from inner need that enabled the animals to survive was then passed on to the offspring the Darwin said would inherit the favorable trait and survive as well until the environment changes and according to Lamarck they modify themselves to suit the environment, while Darwin says the one with the new favorable trait strives in the new environment.
Furthermore, Lamarck's ideas were such a great influence to Darwin's interest in evolution and his ideas of natural selection that his theory could not have developed without it. The idea that the organisms with the desirable traits survive in the environment could not have been developed without the input of Lamarck's giraffe studies and theory that "a trait acquired by an animal during its lifetime can be passed on to the offspring" (Jurmain 30). Essentially, Lamarck had an idea that organisms had to acquire certain traits to prosper in an environment, while Darwin took that idea and expanded on it saying that those with the desirable acquired traits suited for the environment will strive to reproduce more offspring with those traits, which means that natural selection favors those that have the acquired trait suitable for the environment. Lastly, Charles Darwin himself also acknowleged Lamarck as being a massive influence for him as he wrote in 1861 "Lamarck was the first man whose conclusions on the subject excited much attention. This justly celebrated naturalist first published his views in 1801. . . he first did the eminent service of arousing attention to the probability of all changes in the organic, as well as in the inorganic world, being the result of law, and not of miraculous interposition" (umcp.berkley.edu).
In the time that Darwin lived, science was seen as a threat to religion in a some way. As a member of established order he knew that many of his peers would be concerned with threats to the "status quo". Since he lived in a very religious society he was trouble with his wife who "saw his ideas as running counter to her strong religious convictions" (Jurmain 37). The church did not really like anything that went against the belief of God and religion in its entirety, so Darwin's evolution theory was seen as a threat. He continuously waited until Alfred Russel Wallace published an article that suggested that current species descended from other species, and after he was urged by Lyell and others to publish. After Wallace sent another paper to Darwin, he finally took action to publish his work, so that Wallace does not get all the credit. Due to people's attitude towards science with disbelief and the church's opposition to any other belief other than God, Darwin did not publish his theory until Wallace and other's urged him to.
Works Cited (Sources)
"Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829)." Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829). N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Oct. 2016. <http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/lamarck.html>.
Jurmain, Robert, Lynn Kilgore, Wenda Trevathan, and Russell L. Ciochon. Introduction to Physical Anthropology. N.p.: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2014, 2012. Print.
"Lamarck Proposes Natural Selection." Amazing Discoveries. N.p., 15 Feb. 2009. Web. 19 Oct. 2016. <http://amazingdiscoveries.org/C-deception-Lamarck_natural_selection>.
Well-presented post and good inclusion of images.
ReplyDeleteVery good background information on Lamarck and his work and good contrast with Darwin's theory.
While I understand what you arguing with your choice of the "access to resources" bullet point, that wasn't the focus of Lamarck's theory. That particular bullet point best applies to Malthus' influence over Darwin, not Lamarck's. I agree with your other choice regarding the influence of the changing environment, but can you think of any other points that would also apply given your description of Lamarck's proposed mechanism? How about the points that reproduction is necessary for evolution, that traits must be heritable, and that evolution occurs in populations, not individuals, though Lamarck would have argued the opposite, correct?
While I agree that Darwin likely used Lamarck's theory (mistakes and all) as a spring board for his own work, be careful about assigning too much importance to Lamarck. He was important in that he was the first to propose an actual mechanism for evolution, and you can argue that he blazed a trail for Darwin to follow, but he was not the only scientist to be talking about evolution. It was a common topic of interest in the natural scientists and there would have been multiple influences in this respect. It may have taken Darwin a little longer to develop the theory, but the foundation of evolution would have still been present.
Very good discussion in the final section. One point to consider is what, specifically, were Darwin's concerns? Was he only worried about himself or was he also worried about how his family might be impacted by publishing?
Other than a couple of points, good first post.